Editorial standards

Growthegy publishes the Ecommerce Simulator and explainers for ecommerce operators. This page is how we think about accuracy, updates, and independence.

Accuracy and assumptions

The simulator and illustrative examples output directional numbers from the inputs you provide. We label assumptions (for example contribution vs. revenue LTV, attribution windows, margin definitions) so you can line them up with your own finance view—not replace it. Engine details: simulator methodology.

Sources and citations

Where we cite benchmarks or third-party stats, we name the source and timeframe when it helps you verify or cite in turn. Methodology for a specific guide or tool may link to deeper references from the same page. Original teaching-model tables (for example niche baseline outcomes) are labeled as simulator defaults, not industry surveys.

Updates and last-reviewed dates

Flagship guides carry a last-reviewed date in metadata or on-page meta. Tools and hubs evolve as we consolidate flows (for example the Ecommerce Simulator). When a standalone URL is retired, we use permanent redirects to the replacement so bookmarks and external links keep working.

Independence

Editorial picks on the site are chosen for usefulness. Growthegy does not run ads and does not sell sponsorship or paid placement: nobody pays to be included in a guide, ranked, or recommended, and nothing inside the simulator’s scoring, methodology or benchmarks is for sale. If a vendor asks to be added, we evaluate it the way we evaluate anyone else: does it meet the criteria of that guide, and would we include it if they had never emailed? See also our terms of use and privacy policy.

AI-assisted content

Some copy may be drafted or refined with AI; we edit for clarity, factual consistency with our methodology, and usefulness for operators. Interactive tools and numeric logic are implemented in code and reviewed like any other product change.

Questions: Contact · About Growthegy